![]() ![]() That said, I find it sometimes as hard to do as the Epson software. I’m a portrait photographer and I need all the set to look as consistent as possible. I use it not for speed or ease, but for consistency. Sorry to come late to this conversation- I found it when I was looking for best profiles for Lomo CN. When it does that first 1:1 scan, it's going to scan that frame at the full DPI you've got selected- so if you're using 2400 DPI, it's going to scan that frame at 2400 DPI so you can adjust the USM- part of the reason why I primarily use just the SilverFast specific tools. If you are going to use some of the functions like USM, set the DPI to 300 first. I make very few adjustments while scanning- basically, iSRD, negafix, and histogram, and set the white point to the right end of the histogram, the black point to the left end, and leave the midpoint at 0 if possible. Once I'm happy with all the frames, I select batch scan from the File menu, put in my prefix, something like 'IMG_', check "Use Index", and "Remove Numbers", and set the index to "0001" or something equally cheesy. Now each frame has the same basic settings, and I can go through and set the border / histogram on each. Then under frames, I do a "copy to all frames". I keep the navigator window separate, and click on each detected frame.Īdjust the borders while it's scanning, set negafix parameters, and my final scan resolution, turn on iSRD, turn off sharpening. Then hit pre-scan, and then find all frames- but tell it what size negatives I'm using (6圆, for instance). Generally speaking, I load up my negatives, and first, clear all frames. I've got a v800, which is (I assume) much faster, so the re-scans aren't quite as annoying. Might just go back to using Epson Scan problem with that is they aren't porting it to 64bit so its incompatible with macOS Catalina now that 32bit support is dropped and Silver Fast is the only option recommended by Epson themselves. Too many times it wants to constantly re-scan the image while I am trying to make adjustmentsĪm I missing something here? Are people actually using this successfully? So far I have spent about 4-6 hours trying to mess with this software and have nothing to show for it. Still trying to figure out how to get the batch scan to work properly with all the frames, the auto-increment for filenames does not seem to want to work correctly Maybe the worst part, its not possible to output a 48bit TIFF with the color corrections done, the only 48 bit output you can get is some "raw" (not actually "raw") that has nothing done to it keep in mind the biggest draw of using Silver Fast is the NegaFix auto-correction for negatives, and you cant even use that if you are outputting 48bit files In particular, every time I even open the software and start using it, I immediately have problems Īfter I "Find All Frames", Silver Fast wants to re-scan each frame every time I select one to look at, which takes forverĮvery frame it finds is always off-centered by 5-10% or so, requiring that I go through each one and manually drag the frame box around ![]() Been using the stock Epson Scan software for a while with it, and while that software has issues (need to run a program to jiggle the mouse constantly while scanning, Auto-Adjust settings are always messed up and need tweaking.,etc) it at least makes it really easy to batch-scan my 35mm film negatives.Įveryone on YouTube film channels always seems to mention at some point how Silver Fast scanner software is so much better, and I have tried it several times, but it seems to be completely awful.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |